The Recent History of Elite Rule

Various places have commented on a recent article by Peter Turchin on the cycle of inequality. Interestingly it matches pretty well with what I have written, with some important differences. That someone in the mainstream admits that we have an elite, and that they control society largely as they want, is a big development.

In brief Turchin says inequality- he means concentration of elite power, but it would sound paranoid to say that, so he says inequality, which people are supposed to care about- increased until around 1920, when social chaos frightened them into restricting immigration and improving labor conditions, and that they lost interest in keeping inequality in check around 1980, and it has increased since.

He dates the beginning of the truce to 1920, which is too early. The 1924 immigration restrictions were not a peace offering. The elite feared being overwhelmed, and the cheap labor strategy was backfiring. The truce didn’t begin until 1933, and the peace offering was the repeal of Prohibition. Prohibition was a policy largely aimed at the Irish and German populations. The “We Are The World” culture of the 30’s was a big change from the aggressive oppression of German culture around World War I. In World War II the Nazis and Fascist were formally the enemy, and it was emphasized we were not at war with the German or Italian people, although as a practical matter that was the case.

Turchin is a Russian Jew, and like a lot of Protestants doesn’t understand the conflicts between different kinds of American whites. As such you can see his mistake in dating the beginning of the truce. In dating the ending he may be a little intellectually dishonest. The truce formally ended in 1965, partly with the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts, and completely with the black riots that began that year and the commitment to aid blacks at the cost of the destruction of white urban communities. Living standards have been declining since 1972, so where did Turchin get 1980 from? He goes as far as he can by questioning immigration, to bring up racial issues would be going too far with the taboo.

The difference between the 1920’s and now is that then, the working class understood the elite was hostile, and had ways of organizing themselves. Those were lost with the New Deal and the move to the suburbs. People are by and large completely helpless now, and remedying this is the first necessary step in our survival.


About thrasymachus33308

I like fast cars, fast women and southern-fried rock. I have an ongoing beef with George Orwell. I take my name from a character in Plato's "Republic" who was exasperated with the kind of turgid BS that passed for deep thought and political discourse in that time and place, just as I am today. The character, whose name means "fierce fighter" was based on a real person but nobody knows for sure what his actual political beliefs were. I take my pseudonym from a character in an Adam Sandler song who was a obnoxious jerk who pissed off everybody.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The Recent History of Elite Rule

  1. mindweapon says:

    When the Automatic Cornucopia fails, the working classes will again understand the elite is hostile, and will again learn how to organize themselves against it.

  2. Brandon says:

    “….Russian jew…” If that is so, who gives a rats ass what another mommy prof has to say…especially a jew one.

    • Because it’s interesting when people who are not us say what we would say. The intrusion of reality into the official consciousness is inevitable at some point, and will wreak havoc when it does. That’s why I’m fascinated with Walter Russell Mead.

      • Brandon says:

        “The intrusion of reality into the official consciousness is inevitable at some point…”

        Tis true, some may slip up from time to time and speak some truth,but generally speaking most are liars and should be shunned, just like they shun us.

  3. Ryu says:

    Everyone thinks they can just put in their 40 and do their own thing afterward. The country will run itself. Buzzt! Wrong, no. They’ll run it alright, they’ll run it their way.

    This spectatorism is disgusting. It originates in sports and TV. The world belongs to those who get involved and who get their hands dirty. You have to take control.

  4. Pingback: Burma’s dead, long live Burma. | Bloody shovel

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s