Entrepreneurial Denuncation and the Death of Aaron Swartz

Moldbug has a good post on the suicide of boy computer genius and copyright infringer Aaron Swartz. His appraisal is that Swartz picked the wrong target, out of taking the “speak truth to power” and “stick it to the man” rhetoric of the left too literally. A career as a leftist agitator- Moldbug sticks with the more commonly used “activist”- requires being aware of who you can go after and who you can’t.

I’m guessing that Swartz as a former boy computer genius lacked a finely calibrated social sense that allows a person to understand social positioning. Leftism is based on a complicated set of signals in which nothing is explicit and the implicitness of things is quite murky and nuanced. This is largely what “Nineteen eighty-four” is about- the difficulty of understanding and responding appropriately to signals when everything is the opposite of what it seems. Winston is an intelligent, rational person of a literal mind and fails to do this. His work pal Sim, an enthusiastic supporter of the system, is an even earlier casualty.

As the Sam Elliot character says in “The Big Lebowski”, “Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes the bear eats you.” And yet people go bear hunting all the time. Leftism is inherently predatory. Things must be hunted, and while hunting deer will feed you, it has no glamor or honor. In primitive societies young men are expected to hunt vicious beasts and bring back their skins to wear. What Moldbug describes as “hoeing” or “vine cutting”- shaming and humiliating to keep them in line, is the tedious work of teachers, human resource managers, lawyers and journalists. It is no fit work for the inventor of RSS. A man like Swartz- really a young man, hardly more than a boy, must hunt and kill something bigger.

Moldbug says in a leftist society, all the targets that can be attacked have been attacked. And yet things still must be attacked and defeated, to continue to prove its vitality. Sometimes the whole thing just runs out of gas- say Russia by 1960. The US does not so thoroughly crush all its opponents, it finds it more useful to keep some around.

But let’s take the case of a young, ambitious NKVD officer in Moscow in the 30’s. If he takes people down, he gains power. If he takes on the wrong people, he finds himself on the train to Siberia. It’s a dangerous game, which makes it all the more exciting. Many officers of the secret police wiped out their enemies, only to find themselves in the same snare shortly after. But it didn’t stop many from playing. And if you can’t take on respected leftists and respected leftist institutions, well there wasn’t anything else in Moscow in Stalin’s time.

But Swartz was a computer nerd, and not a combatant. He bit off more than he could chew, and folded when things got hot. He should have gotten an aggressive lawyer and angled for a sympathetic judge, made a lot of angry and defiant pronouncements at press conferences, and held out to the bitter end. I understand what he wanted- leftist glory, not just the pale esteem that geniuses get. How much cooler his life would have been. How much more the girls would have swooned for him.

The desire to dominate and control others is deeply engrained in the human character. In decent societies this urge comes under some control. In leftist society it is given free reign to produce the worst. It’s easy to see what happens to people on the bottom. But people higher up get caught in the web also, although few so spectacularly as Aaron Swartz.


About thrasymachus33308

I like fast cars, fast women and southern-fried rock. I have an ongoing beef with George Orwell. I take my name from a character in Plato's "Republic" who was exasperated with the kind of turgid BS that passed for deep thought and political discourse in that time and place, just as I am today. The character, whose name means "fierce fighter" was based on a real person but nobody knows for sure what his actual political beliefs were. I take my pseudonym from a character in an Adam Sandler song who was a obnoxious jerk who pissed off everybody.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Entrepreneurial Denuncation and the Death of Aaron Swartz

  1. Heil Hizzle says:

    “Moldbug says in a leftist society, all the targets that can be attacked have been attacked.”
    Yeah, but the belief among the shallow thinkers who would have feted Schwarz with praise is that Nixon’s Silent Moral Majority is still running things, along with the support of its mouthpiece Fox News, and that brave rogues like Obama and MSNBC are standing up to the evil scourge.

    Schwarz could have had a wardrobe of “Free Mumia” and “Justice for Trayvon” shirts, written a few op-eds about racist tea partying rednecks and nativist fascists, and he would have been toasted, praised, etcetera.

    Of course, you seem to be suggesting that he was after bigger game. Much like Christopher McCandless or Timothy Treadwell, the impression I get is that he was an annoying young man who thought he had the touch to tame the bear (in his case figuratively, rather than in Treadwell’s literal case of miscalculation).

    I have to confess that I’ve been so jaded by my dealings with the left, and the depth of their depravity, that much like when Breivik made his mark, I felt only mild relief at this boy’s death. Even as I type that I realize that is not the way a nominal Christian is supposed to think, but here I am.

  2. Ryu says:

    Hey! Ready to thrash some parking lot niggers? LOL. I’ll bring Piggy.

    Moldberg sounds like a good writer. The left’s number of enemies is on the decline while the number of leftists increases. What to do? I will be happy the day when they begin attacking one another.

    Have you been following what’s happening in South Africa? Censor Bug Bear thinks they are ready for revolution or something.

  3. Abelard Lindsey says:

    The desire to dominate and control others is deeply engrained in the human character.

    Which is why so very few are genuinely libertarian.

    Heinlein said that people divide politically into two groups: those who believe humans should be controlled and those who have no such desire. All political labels are false.

    • Heil Hizzle says:

      Libertarian laissez faire attitudes toward immigration are just as oppressive ideologies foisted on us by Marxists and Plutocrats. Not protecting your borders because you believe in respecting the rights of people who aren’t even citizens (and thus have no civil rights) abrogates the rights of those you’re supposed to protect.

  4. Swartz eventually came to the sad realization that he was attacking…his own Jew-State. Nothing left but to self-destruct. Good riddance.

  5. Pingback: More Entrepreneurial Leftism | Deconstructing Leftism

  6. Pingback: “I Have Nothing to Say” | Deconstructing Leftism

  7. Pingback: Enrepreneurial Leftism, Again | Deconstructing Leftism

  8. Pingback: From Ayn Rand to Abbie Hoffman | Deconstructing Leftism

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s