Full Negro Or Peak Negro?

I discussed yesterday the phenomenon of Full Negro, and its relationship to our overall current and prefered (by the powerful) state of Half Negro. (Partial Negro is a little more accurate, but Half Negro has a better ring to it.)

Charles Blow of the NYT salutes the coming of the new brown America, which he seems to inaccurately assume will be like the current state of Half Negro but only more so, even better for blacks. He doesn’t take into account that most of the browning will be Hispanic, people who neither like nor feel any sense of obligation towards blacks.

What he doesn’t take into account is the change in attitudes of whites, a possible peaking and reversal of black power due to the end of white guilt as I talked about with regards to Trayvon Martin, Peak Negro. Half Negro depends on the ability of blacks, under the guidance of elite whites, to intimidate non-elite whites and keep them off balance. Full Negro is essentially a failure because whites leave, and blacks can only benefit from them by resources sent from a distance, not by their actual presence. As often noted, blacks go to bad schools because the students are black.

America has been strongly Negrified by the system, and white children worship blacks as never before. But the idea as seeing blacks as weak and oppressed is out of date. Blow quotes increasing hostility towards blacks by whites, and this is because of their uncomfortably high level of legal and political power and their stranglehold on the culture.

Somebody noted that Obama’s reelection depended on blacks, that the Democrats can’t count on black enthusiasm for a non-black candidate, and may not have such good results next time. Blow is right, there are profound changes coming, but to assume blacks and browns will simply go from victory to victory is short-sighted. The overall wealth of America is decreasing, due to the increased proportion of browns and blacks and the impoverishment of whites. There is less to be redistributed, and whites are going to be less willing to give to buy peace. In a nation where things are not presumptively white, white identity will inevitably increase.


About thrasymachus33308

I like fast cars, fast women and southern-fried rock. I have an ongoing beef with George Orwell. I take my name from a character in Plato's "Republic" who was exasperated with the kind of turgid BS that passed for deep thought and political discourse in that time and place, just as I am today. The character, whose name means "fierce fighter" was based on a real person but nobody knows for sure what his actual political beliefs were. I take my pseudonym from a character in an Adam Sandler song who was a obnoxious jerk who pissed off everybody.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Full Negro Or Peak Negro?

  1. Heil Hizzle Mein Nizzle says:

    Don’t the “New York Times” house negro get under your skin, and become the next Coates, i.e. an endless source of irritation that distracts you from making more profound analysis.

    I think you’re wrong about younger whites worshiping blacks as never before. This phenomenon, of lower class whites worshiping blacks (“wiggers” in America, and “chavs” in Britain), is on the wane, as is SWPL negrophilia. Too many white kids have had their bikes stolen in the last few years, either literally or figuratively (or both). The Left prizes its meme of the old evil racist white dinosaurs dying out so that the young enlightened whites can usher in the era of a post-racial utopia, but the truth is that the Left’s nerve center is still (as you know) among the oldest whitest people in America, i.e. New England.

    Young white people in Europe, particularly France, know their back is against the wall now. White kids in America, especially the ones going to public state universities, have black racial chauvinism shoved in their faces on a daily basis. They’ll keep their mouths shut and parrot the party line when it means an easy “A,” but people who weren’t alive for Jim Crow, let alone slavery, are not going to remain pliant taffy in the hands of their abusers forever.

  2. mindweapon says:

    Right you are Hail Hizzle.

    I’m not upset about being a demographic minority. Voting was always a stupid charade anyway. Let’s be done with it. There may come a time when whites don’t even bother to vote. When it comes to that, Chucky Blow better be very worried!

    What I want to see is White kids who are fanatically protective about their race, their gene pool, and who absolutely despise mixers and traitors.

    If we have that, who cares about anything else. When our people are on our side, the sky is the limit.

  3. Pingback: Daily Linkage – December 16, 2012 | The Second Estate

  4. TFT says:

    the truth is that the Left’s nerve center is still (as you know) among the oldest whitest people in America, i.e. New England.

    This point is so important, so crucial, and it really needs to make its way beyond the alt-right sphere and into the mainstream discourse. Everyone should be leaving comments along these lines in every Gawker blog, every Daily Kos thread, every mainstream newspaper site. You don’t even need to sketch out some big treatise every time; sometimes all you need to do is drop a quick, “You’re a f**ing puritan” and be done with it.

    But either way, drive the point home to these progressives: THEY are the puritans. It’s THEIR ideological lineage. THEY are the heirs of the witch-burners and do-gooders. THEY are the modern version of those hysterical people.

    I think the whole “Puritanism = universalism = progressivism” idea, fleshed out at length by Moldbug, is one of the most critical working concepts in the alt-right realm. It’s an important insight, and it really deserves a wider hearing. If we want to affect the culture — and ultimately that’s the only way any of this madness is going to change — we’ve got to make the 25-year-old SWPLs squirm, and maybe even think a little bit, by revealing to them who they really are.

  5. bj2k says:

    This is a good post. I’ve been thinking about the idea that whites are really the world’s scarcest resource (assuming that human capital is the most valuable). Whites’ real skill is organization, essentially the ability to queue without rioting. Not the case in Asia (except maybe northeast Asia), Israel, Africa, and I don’t know about Hispanics, but probably not good queuers either. What really matters is what Lagriffe calls “smart fraction,” essentially the percentage of the population with a verbal IQ over 106. These are the white collar foot soldiers in large organizations. We might say that peak black is reached when the white fraction falls below some critical value (actually, I think you did say exactly that). At that point the organizational and cooperational skills of whites are swamped by non-whites (Asians not being much help here, despite their smarts). This is also why the “we need more smart immigrants” argument doesn’t work, because it’s not intelligence but cooperation or “social capital” that’s key. (Some people point to white innovation, but innovation is a product of cooperation. Silicon Valley is a collective enterprise).

    Just some wandering thoughts triggered by your post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s