Certain social norms need to be enforced to have a functioning society. These include not threatening, harassing, or extorting people on the street- things that are criminal but usually not treated as such. They include obeying basic laws on parking and loitering, things that are civil infractions but often ignored. In a healthy society people do these things voluntarily and gladly, as members of the community. Police deal with serious breaches of the peace such as serious assault, armed robbery and murder.
Any society will have a few people who just do not want to obey the rules. In a healthy society these people are shunted into small, confined blighted areas where the police keep close watch on them and they give grief to their own kind mostly.
Should a problem develop where you have a lot of people who are causing trouble, the police are not really the institution to enforce social norms. The Victorian police established by Sir Robert Peel did this, but that kind of social control is foreign to most Americans and Europeans. What is supposed to happen is that these people are confronted- morally and socially by older people and social leaders, physically by strong aggressive men. Some will be shamed into conforming, some will withdraw to the slum, some will be defiant. The defiant ones- I just realized that was the title of a civil rights themed movie- will take a beating and either leave town on their own or with an escort.
In both Detroit and Berlin the informal and formal methods of social control have failed. The police won’t do anything- they are instructed not to. The gas station owner can hire an off-duty cop to guard the premises- a subtle form of police extortion- but the off-duty cop will likely not do much. He could recruit some young family members, sons or nephews, to show up and explain to the gang members they need to leave and not come back. They would be mocked and dismissed, and would need to come back with baseball bats and shotguns and make their point more forcefully.
But any confrontation with an anti-social member of a protected class- a Moslem in Europe, a black in the US- is credited as a crime to the confronter. Even if the confrontation is completely peaceful, and even if the confronter is assaulted and does not fight back. If he does fight back- which he is clearly entitled to do under any coherent moral system- he will be charged with a crime. I was reading the other day about English parents trying to get their under-aged daughters away from Moslem rapists being charged.
The white strategy of isolation is only so effective. If you have kids they will be bombarded by Negro-worshipping propaganda many hours a day by MTV even if you live in Montana. But resistance is a crime. Can you tell your children to stay away from blacks and not consume black death culture? You will likely get a visit from child welfare if you do.
If you try to protect yourself, you hate and want to kill black people. If you lived in Greece you could call Golden Dawn, but you don’t live in Greece. God Bless America!