You May Now Defend Your Home Against Police in Indiana

In Indiana citizens may now use deadly force against police officers illegally entering their homes. To me this signals that blue-collar white people, traditionally strong police supporters, are coming to realize the police are just another agency of the leftist state and not their friends.


About thrasymachus33308

I like fast cars, fast women and southern-fried rock. I have an ongoing beef with George Orwell. I take my name from a character in Plato's "Republic" who was exasperated with the kind of turgid BS that passed for deep thought and political discourse in that time and place, just as I am today. The character, whose name means "fierce fighter" was based on a real person but nobody knows for sure what his actual political beliefs were. I take my pseudonym from a character in an Adam Sandler song who was a obnoxious jerk who pissed off everybody.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to You May Now Defend Your Home Against Police in Indiana

  1. Ryu says:

    Well…that may be the letter of the law. It’s nothing until its actually tested. Theoretically we can also perform a citzen’s arrest of an LEO, but that rarely happens.

    You can’t have the police watching over themselves. We’re depending on these guys to supervise themselves, to screw over a brother officer who might be called for backup in the future.

    That’s a problem with only being able to use the stick and not using the carrot. They’re able to use violence with no blowbacks, at least not yet. It’s easy to become overreliant on using violence; its easier to destroy a man than to educate him. A good cop never has to pull out his gun/taser/baton. The best security is a free and responsible people, not a super duper military force.

  2. Rusty says:

    What about whenever the TSA monkeys molest my wife and children?

  3. Too little too late….

  4. Rusty says:

    Liberty is dearly gained and easily lost.

  5. Jehu says:

    It’ll be interesting to see what happens should some passenger decide to avenge himself on the TSA for their molestation of his wife and children. Wonder what the jury would think (ok, I can tell you what I’d be thinking, taqiyya overload and NOT guilty). A woman in Arizona a while back twisted the breast of a TSA screener in retaliation to being searched, and Arizona told the TSA to piss off in their request to try her for assaulting a LEO. That might be the proper way to get the TSA out of one’s state.

  6. Pingback: Introsphere roundup – Week thru June 12 | The Second Estate

  7. Heil Hizzle Mein Nizzle says:


    Completely off-topic, and I know you’ve reached Negro fatigue, but in spite of that I have to post a link to this video:

    I discovered Smack Fest when I was in the Army. Though most of the contestants were black, the videos were popular with Puerto Rican and Dominicans from the Bronx. I believe it would be interesting to hear your analysis.

    • Black people love violence. They aren’t *violent*, in that violence is a ready tool and resource for them; people can be very violent without loving violence. But black people love violence. I’m guessing the Puerto Ricans and Dominicans you describe are substantially African.

      In “A Note to Foreign Readers on Street Safety” I mentioned how blacks can be happy and goofing around and instantaneously turn violent, *while still being happy and goofing*. This is very difficult for non-blacks to get their heads around; but the truth is arrived at by empirical observation, and crazy as it is, black people *love* violence.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s