As our leftist Sunday school teacher, Father Ignacio has explained to us, violent rage is the natural product of cruelty and injustice. The resulting violence, possibly at a shocking level, can even be seen as God’s wrath punishing evildoers, and quotes Psalm 58 as evidence. He’s not, as the would say on Family Guy, the freakin’ Pope, but he’s a freakin’ Jesuit intellectual of high repute, and even regarded as a martyr, so who are we to disagree?
My study bible (Zondervan NIV if you’re curious)- carefully qualifies this. It notes that this and other psalms call for extremely violent and cruel retribution by God. It emphasizes however that the psalmist calls on God to execute the punishment; he is not going to do it himself. It compares these to a victim impact statement in court- God invites the victim to pour out the depths of his anguish, rage, and sorrow, and hears it, although he is not going to necessarily inflict the punishment the victim wants.
Hate is of course in our leftist world a thing of privilege- the communist guerillas of El Salvador and other Latin American countries were quite entitled to it, by the lights of Father Ignacio, their victims not. We are daily assured that black rage is quite entirely justified, and we must patiently bear the predations of blacks as our just punishment.
A couple of people have let loose their anger recently. One was a Korean-American songwriter and sometime performer by the name of Jenny Hyun. Her tweets were captured on a group blog of expats in Korea, with the appropriate shocked approbrium of course. She- or a representative- quickly backed off and said she was a paranoid schizophrenic, having an episode, and had been hospitalized. It was speculated this was a way to get her off the hook and away from angry mobs, but people looking over her blog noted a history of serious psychiatric problems requiring medication.
As somebody, I forget who, noted, why is it that crazy and senile people always seem to make such cogent observations? Ms. Hyun’s criticisms of blacks are that they are poor workers, consume charitable and government welfare resources, are “disrespectful, violent, arrogant, stupid”, incapable of advancing on their own, and society would be better off without them. This is harsh, but not without documentary evidence.
She was born and lived for a while in the Los Angeles area, her family then moved to Virginia then New York, then she lived in Los Angeles and New York again. In urban environments especially, Asians catch hell from blacks. I’m sure she has had relatives and friends who have been the victim of violent crime by blacks. Aside from actual crime, black people bully and disrespect Asians in environments where they have domination- any place they are 30% or more, approximately, of the population. In the entertainment industry she has seen how blacks suck up the oxygen in any environment they are in- their childish sense that they should always be the center of attention, demanding it and getting it because blacks are always automatically deferred to.
Rape, robbery, assault, and murder are horrifying experiences that scar the victim for life and cause tremendous pain for their friends and relatives. We are expected to ignore this and pretend blacks are wonderful, but maybe somehow victims have their voice on the internet, just as they do in the Psalms.
Another example is the question raised by Colin Liddell, “Is Black Genocide Right?” He asks it in the context of the vast amount of unusually cruel crime and violence perpetrated against the Afrikaner community of South Africa, as chronicled in the Afrikaner Genocide Archives and the constantly moving South Africa Sucks. Ethnic cleansing and genocide don’t have to operate at a highly organized level, and since these crimes are based on the belief that Afrikaners are evil and inhuman, and have no right to live in South Africa the terms are certainly appropriate.
Liddell asks, why should whites be the victims? Why shouldn’t blacks be the ones on the receiving end? The only decent, moral, human reaction to these crimes is overwhelming ager and rage- not “understanding”, or excuses, or talking about hundreds of years of slavery and oppression- which South Africa never had.
Gramscian Marxism- which many leftist Christian denominations have assimiliated, even the Roman Catholic Church to a significant extent- regards crime as a legitimate understandable response to oppression, and a form of revolution. If it is regrettable in any way, it is because it is disorganized. I think this is where Ignacio Ellacuria really got his theology from, not the Bible. And yet it’s the very essence of Christianity that two wrongs don’t make a right, vengeance belongs to God, and peace demands giving up some things to which we might believe we are entitled.
Ideally, maybe, blacks and whites wouldn’t live together. Whites would suffer virtually no harm, and great benefit. Blacks would suffer great harm, as they are heavily dependent on whites for sustenance and governance. The separation itself would be considered genocide, and blacks would demand huge amounts of food and medical aid. If they would accept white rule in the bargain, that might be reasonable- white-run African and Caribbean colonies have worked alright. But they won’t- Haiti still insists on having its own government, even though it is completely incapable of doing anything.
All we need to really do is apply an objective standard of behavior to all people, including blacks, and not tolerate their bad behavior. Some segregation would be desirable, residential and educational. Whites and Asians could live with much less fear. Hispanics don’t seem to be afraid of blacks, or have much trouble from them, which is a lesson itself.
Hatred and rage toward blacks for the evil behavior widespread among them is to be expected. It may not be pretty, or wise or just but it is not unjust and it is not “racism”. It’s an ugly and inevitable fact of a wicked world.