Gays Are Exactly Like Blacks

I have been meaning to post something about “Degenerate Moderns” by E. Michael Jones, which posits that modern culture exists largely to justify sexual license. But I saw something today that touches on that, because his first example was the gay British KGB spies of Oxford. Jones says their homosexuality made them hate their own country.

I saw something today that reminded me of this; a white guy in Austin gets shaken down by the cops while with his black granddaughter. The key clue is early in the article. He doesn’t say, but the easily-winded female cop who stops them the first time is almost certainly a fat lesbian. You don’t see fat male cops or firemen, but I have seen fat, old lesbian police officers and firefighters in my town. Why would a city hire somebody obviously not physically qualified for a job like this?

The obvious answer is “diversity” or “affirmative action”, or punishing working-class white men and rewarding political supporters. But as usual there’s more to it.

Gays do not appear to be like blacks. Blacks, while engaging in a lot of homosexual behavior, don’t accept effeminate behavior, or open homosexuality. Gays, whether they have money or not, like to model upper-class behavior, and probably find black culture uncouth, though they won’t say it. But, both gays and blacks hate the society they live in. Blacks can never really succeed or fit in. Gays will never be more than tolerated by most people, even those who claim to not only accept but love them.

As I have written before, the elite sees blacks and gays as servants, and both groups more or less accept this status. Being a servant is a bit galling in a theoretically egalitarian society, but along with the groveling servility comes protection and mean kind of status- better to be a house negro than a field negro.

But just as the master looks out for his servant, the servant looks out for his master. As an individual affirmative action hire or as a group of political actors, blacks and gays act as a combination of spies and enforcers. Affirmative action hires don’t simply enjoy the fruits of political loyalty, they also watch non-elite whites for politically deviant behavior.

Libertarian-inclined people are more tolerant of gays than blacks. Blacks engage in a lot of aggressive anti-social behavior, while gays don’t. The desire to let other people pursue happiness as they see it is a strong one- it starts the Declaration of Independence. And gays always frame their behavior and political goals in libertarian terms- that they only want to do what other people can do.

But it’s clear gays are not the friends of freedom in any way. Jones is right, they have an instinctive hatred of conventional society. The excuse of discrimination doesn’t hold up- among the upper class of England, homosexuality was a normal part of life, encouraged by putting boys in boarding schools away from their families and girls. And today when homosexuality is more tolerated and accepted than ever, gays devotion to leftism and hostility towards traditional life is stronger than ever.

I’m still a libertarian on some level. I don’t want to tell anybody what they can or can’t do that is only their own business, aside from externalities like the public cost of STDs- or contraception. But if your personal makeup gives you the untameable desire to control the rest of society, your freedom is my slavery.

Advertisements

About thrasymachus33308

I like fast cars, fast women and southern-fried rock. I have an ongoing beef with George Orwell. I take my name from a character in Plato's "Republic" who was exasperated with the kind of turgid BS that passed for deep thought and political discourse in that time and place, just as I am today. The character, whose name means "fierce fighter" was based on a real person but nobody knows for sure what his actual political beliefs were. I take my pseudonym from a character in an Adam Sandler song who was a obnoxious jerk who pissed off everybody.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Gays Are Exactly Like Blacks

  1. RS says:

    This is very like what Nietzsche wrote (at length) about ressentiment. Whoever has little hope of high status, can only resent.

    He suggested that the Greeks and Romans conceived of good and bad only, not of good and evil. (Heraclitus: One must realize that war is shared and conflict is justice, and all things come to pass in accordance with conflict [eris].) Instead of hating the evil man, the ancients experienced contempt for the weak man in his near-uselessness to the society. Anyway, he asserts that the notion of evil was/is invented and amplified mainly by the resentful.

    As for what’s amiss with the weak in the first place (individuals or races), Nietzsche suggested their biology was inferior to the biology of the best, which seems to be accurate: whether or not someone is affected by illness, there’s always deleterious mutations to sap their vitality. (Without these, I take it, all people would be extremely good-looking. Obviously comeliness is under positive selection, so there has to be a reason why the whole population doesn’t become perfect after some number of generations.)

  2. RS says:

    This is very like what Nietzsche wrote (at length) about ressentiment. Whoever has little hope of high status, can only resent.

    He suggested that the Greeks and Romans conceived of good and bad only, not of good and evil. (Heraclitus: One must realize that war is shared and conflict is justice, and all things come to pass in accordance with conflict [eris].) Instead of hating the evil man, the ancients experienced contempt for the weak man in his near-uselessness to the society. Anyway, he asserts that the notion of evil was/is invented and amplified mainly by the resentful.

    As for what’s amiss with the weak in the first place (individuals or races), Nietzsche suggested their biology was inferior to the biology of the best, which seems to be accurate: whether or not someone is affected by illness, there’s always deleterious mutations to sap their vitality. (Without these, I take it, all people would be extremely good-looking. Obviously comeliness is under positive selection, so there has to be a reason why the whole population doesn’t become perfect after some number of generations.) ..

  3. seedofjapheth says:

    Do you think that they became gay first and then hated traditional society or do you think they became gay due to their hatred of traditional society. What do you think made them hate traditional society?

    • I think being gay for your average public school boy was something you did as a boy at school, but you dropped it as an adult. Situational homosexuality, in other words. If you had developed a stronger taste for it and now your friends are rolling their eyes when you offered them a blow job- like you were still collecting Star Wars figures or something- you would feel hurt and rejected.

      • seedofjapheth says:

        An interesting phenomena I have noticed is gay people searching for instances of discrimination due to loving to complain about being discriminated against.

  4. Steve Johnson says:

    Mencius hit just this theme here:

    http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/09/real-meaning-of-diversity.html

    In Nazi Germany every corporation had to have a party member on the board of directors for exactly the same reason.

  5. Maaldweb says:

    change Oxford with Cambridge.

    You are talking about the Cambridge Five,

  6. Anon says:

    Lesbians are fundamentally different from gay men. Sure, there are many lesbians who hate America, but they are the minority and they are concentrated in DC/NY/LA/SF/ETC. Lesbians align more with blue collar men than with the elite.

  7. Pingback: Linkage is Good for You: Week of February 19, 2012

  8. Evan White says:

    Hello, i am Evan White, im gay and 17 years old, ive known i was gay since 12 and i do not fit in your description. I really dont know how I am the enimy of freedom. To be honest i encourage freedom and tolerate the intolerable. If you basing your claim on recent legislation well hear this, the only thing we want is harrasment to stop And equality, we dont want to limit free Speech but i personally detest HATE speech which is what we are trying to deter. I dont understand what all your facts are based off of but they are very, very questionable. Could you please respond to me in an email so i we can have a healthy debate. To conclude your portrait of me is innacurate, i am a strong mud loving, painballer and in additiom i dont hate society, i infact thank its hatred, for they are showing me what it must have felt luke for jesus, and if i stay nice to others and stay good, well ill die happy.

    • If I say something you don’t like, something critical of gays, then that’s “hate” speech. My free speech is your hate speech. Pretty soon you’ll be able to get people for belonging to a traditional church.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s