Half Sigma notes a female Jewish HBD/altright blogger, She is new and goes by The Tribe of Ice People. Welcome to the world of The Guy Under the Seats, Tribe, where we issue angry threats from our dark hiding places. It’s better than grinding our teeth as we rock back and forth hugging our knees, at least. I noted another example is Latte Island.
In reality I think most Jews understand HBD. They see how different races are in intelligence and behavior. They are very careful not to say it though, because Jews have a strong relationship with the system.
As John Derbyshire has said, you can’t say anything about Jews, good or bad, without being called anti-semitic. With that in mind, I will give my view on Jews in general. It is widely believed, and by no one more than Jews themselves, that the Jews secretly run things. I will tell you that the Jews do not secretly run things, for which anti-semites will think I am a Jew-lover in on the conspiracy, and Jews will think I am denigrating their lofty accomplishments.
The truth is, Jews have simply made themselves useful to the power structure in whatever country they were in, without ever actually running things or calling the shots. The closest they came was the early Soviet Union; they were very powerful and influential in it, but I’m not sure that you can say they actually ran it. When Jews got to America, they saw who was running things- the Puritans in shorthand- and made themselves useful to them. Jews like to be visible, and Puritans do not, so Jews look more powerful than they really are. Jews have largely adopted the attitudes, values and beliefs of elite whites, and more recently have intermarried with them, so they are even losing their status as a distinct group.
But how does this make them that much different than other post-Civil War immigrants? These immigrants and their descendents- white, but not Anglo-Saxon or Protestant, settled mostly in Northern or Midwestern cities and sometimes farms, and became a politically and socially distinct group or set of groups from the earlier English, German, and Dutch settlers. The Civil War settled the issue of what old American, English-descended group was in charge- it was the Puritans and Quakers, who defeated the Cavaliers and Borderers with the help of midwestern Germans and Scandinavians, and other groups that wanted a free-soil West. Any group arriving after the Civil War was going to have to cooperate with the group in power.
The Irish already had a toehold, and a share of power through urban machine politics. While the Puritans liked Jews, they had a deep hatred of the Irish, and the hatred was mutual. The two groups have never completely cooperated, but ultimately a disproportionately large number of Irish Americans came to support the liberal politics of elite whites, and join the system as lawyers, politicians, and teachers.
Italians had a more difficult position. The urban machines were already controlled by the Irish and Jews when they arrived, so many became Republicans- liberal Republicans of the northeastern sort, but Republicans nonetheless. But in the end the system had the power, and the majority of Italians- and other central and eastern European whites- cooperated with the system and in the process adpoted many of its values.
Scandinavians are a group as slavishly and reflexively liberal as Jews. Many were socialists and some communists. Their culture does not lend itself to gaining power in America though, so they have not had any significant influence on the system other than supporting it. Germans fall in the same category, although I don’t think they have been quite as liberal.
The great break in American politics came in the 70’s, when these whites- who were now dubbed the “ethnics” or “Reagan Democrats”- decided the elitist, progressive Democrats no longer represented their interests, and began to vote for Republicans. They hadn’t actually become conservative- the Democrats had become more liberal, too liberal for many to stomach.
The reasons for this- increasing violence by blacks, and the promotion of black interests by the system over their interests- caused some Jews to lose faith in the system, but they had always been the most loyal of the ethnics, and they remained the most loyal. Jews are the most Democratic and liberal of whites, and those that are not Democrats are usually loyal establishment Republicans- labeled with the misused term “neoconservative”.
Jews are loyal to the system, but it’s only a matter of degree- most people are loyal to the system to one extent or another. The system is unlikely to die or collapse any time soon, but it is becoming weaker and less able to take initiative. Jews, like everybody else, are going to have to decide where to place their bets as the world changes.