Walter Russell Meade on the “Blue Social Structure”

Walter Russell Meade uses a police scandal in New York City- and the cop’s rather surprising public support for the blue lawbreakers-  to launch an analysis of the other Blue, the big blue social model/political structure.

Reactionaries rage against it. Conservatives reprove it. A few- Moldbug, Foseti, me- analyze it. Meade takes the unusual step for a mainstream conservative of analysis, and he makes a pretty good observation of how it all wraps up. He appreciates that the government has a huge constituency, including de facto government employees such as health care workers, and adds one I hadn’t thought of- construction, which while not as dependent on government spending as health care, is still a big client, especially for some specialized firms.

He vastly overstates the interest in the educated upper-middle class in good government, going so far as to call them “goo-goos” on that account. The only real evidence of this is some willingness to confront teachers’ unions on control of schools. As for the rest- cutting spending, pensions, deregulation- they have no interest at all.

Meade points out that “special privileges” abound, and not just for cops. He doesn’t admit, or realize, that these are a fundamental part of the blue social system. In a heavily regulated society, you need a certain slack to survive. For some it’s tickets torn up, for others it’s permits walked through. Giving people a freebie every once in a while keeps them from chafing under all the other rules too much.

Right now the system has some stress, but not much. New York was bailed out- the money is mostly there to take care of anybody important. When and if ever the stuff hits the fan, we’ll see how strong it really is.


About thrasymachus33308

I like fast cars, fast women and southern-fried rock. I have an ongoing beef with George Orwell. I take my name from a character in Plato's "Republic" who was exasperated with the kind of turgid BS that passed for deep thought and political discourse in that time and place, just as I am today. The character, whose name means "fierce fighter" was based on a real person but nobody knows for sure what his actual political beliefs were. I take my pseudonym from a character in an Adam Sandler song who was a obnoxious jerk who pissed off everybody.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s