The Death of the White Race

I write this without hope it will do any good, or even that anyone will read it. Maybe some Chinese researcher combing the archives in a thousand years, looking into the disappearance of the Europeans. He will snort, in that uniquely Chinese way, at how obvious it all was and quickly move on.

White people aren’t going to die out completely. They are too useful for that. A few pure ones may even exist out in the boonies somewhere. What part of the genome that does survive will be largely mixed with Asians and of course Jews- rich Jews may yet be acquiring blonde shiksa trophy wives, although that will probably be just a hush, whispered legend among them.

But mostly white people will be gone, because they are a nuisance and aren’t needed in large numbers. You read this all the time without being convinced, so let me explain myself.

White people will reproduce only under favorable conditions. I call this conditional natalism, Steve Sailer calls it affordable family formation.

Maybe this is a remnant of K selection– smaller families and more parental investment- and some element of group selection where not all members reproduce. The non-reproducing members of societies inside the Hajnal line must have helped their families and those societies.

Europe in isolation lived and developed like this. But Europe and its peoples no longer live in isolation. They are being out-competed by organisms that function completely differently.

Africans will, as far as I can tell, reproduce under almost any conditions. Short of total starvation they will keep reproducing and their numbers will keep increasing. Moslems of most kinds- Arabs, Turks, Southwest Asians, Central Asians- are like this also. I’m not sure about Hispanics. The presence of these people and their parasitic consumption of white resources stresses white people and makes it much harder for them to reproduce.

Left to their own devices, Africans would boom and crash by mass starvation. Moslems seem to deal with excess population by fighting each other, which kills off excess young men and civilians not wanted as slaves.

Unfortunately we will not let these people starve to death or kill each other off. It wouldn’t be Christian, or humane, or something. We send food to Africa or much worse, let Africans and Moslems come to our countries. We encourage their own increase while harming ours.

Capitalism likes to have a large amount of workers and consumers. Populations are moved around the globe to achieve this, and become obsolete. Africans aren’t needed to grow sugar cane in Brazil, and haven’t been for a long time, but in Brazil they remain. Europeans are still needed to grow grain in North America, but in very few numbers. Obsolete European and African peasants were useful for awhile as factory workers, but that work has been mostly transferred to obsolete Chinese peasants.

Useless Africans and Moslems die in Africa or Moslems countries, or subside on welfare and crime in European countries. Useless Europeans are dying off. The lower level ones die directly from poor health and drugs, the middle level ones just fail to reproduce.

Upper class whites facilitate this process through their embrace of capitalism. Jews have always been a parasitic population but didn’t get involved in the racket of global capitalism until they started sugar plantations in Brazil.

Africans and Moslems are genocidal peoples. They invade the territories of other peoples and destroy them. Mass killing is hardly necessary; low level crime and harassment, assault, rape, and murder drives them away, breaks their communities, and stresses them to where they can’t reproduce. No gas chambers, no mass graves but it’s still genocide.

Upper class whites and Jews are genocidal in making this happen. It’s well under way in Europe. It’s slower and less dramatic but still happening to whites outside of Europe. South Africa is a slow-motion horror movie.

Nazi Germany was I think a reaction to this. Germans saw what was happening in an earlier era and fought back. The powers that be decided this must never happen again, and won’t let it.

White people are burdened with too much responsibility. We are always told to work harder and discipline ourselves to survive. Whites must work hard and be disciplined, but they must be provided with an environment where this has more than a small chance of succeeding. Non-whites have little to no responsibility. They expect, and whites are expected, to carry the burden for them.

My brother and sister are childless. They screwed up their lives, if you can call not being optimally successful screwing up. Nobody helped them, and they couldn’t help themselves. I have one kid, who I hope I can move up the greasy pole of life just a little bit. I will prepare him the best I can for the world that is coming.

It will be pretty fucked up, but I hope he and his descendants will be OK.

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

The War

A Soviet military intelligence officer who uses the pen name Viktor Suvorov wrote several books about his career. In one he relates his induction into the USSR’s foreign military intelligence service, the GRU.

As cover he is being interviewed for a position as a foreign military advisor. He is asked where he would like to go. He replies, “The war is over in the hot and wet countries (meaning Southeast Asia) but not the hot and dry countries (meaning the Middle East) so I would like to go to the hot and dry countries.”

“That,” one of his interviewers tells him, “is where you are wrong. The war is going on everywhere, all the time.”

The interviewer meant that the struggle as broadly defined- far more than just combat, but all the measures taken to overcome the enemy- was always going on, and the task for which Suvorov was being evaluated, the collection of intelligence under diplomatic cover in foreign countries, was every bit as much a part of this as a battle between armed, uniformed soldiers.

The war is in truth going on everywhere, all the time. You are a soldier in it whether you like it or not. You will fight every day until you die. Keep this in mind always.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Anti-Natalism vs. Non-Natalism vs. Incompetent Natalism

The future belongs to those who show up. White people aren’t showing up much these days. This is a problem that if left unaddressed the solution of all other problems will be meaningless.

Anti-natalism is the affirmative answer to the question “Is life itself horror?” and has a long philosophical history. Most current advocates base it on environmental, earth-worship grounds. Explicit anti-natalism however is not a significant factor in most peoples’ reproductive decisions.

Implicit anti-natalism is another matter. Most white people will not have children unless they believe they can provide them with a reasonably decent home and future. This might be described as conditional anti-natalism. Required are a trustworthy spouse, a decent income, a safe and comfortable dwelling, and a safe environment.

This seems to have been the line of thinking of all European peoples inside the Hajnal Line, where about 80% of people historically married and reproduced and about 20% did not. Countering this was the demand on unmarried people to remain celibate. Since unmarried people are no longer expected to remain celibate, this counter-balance is no longer there.

Outside the Hajnal Line, rates of marriage were higher. I suspect in these areas the imperative to avoid sexual immorality was stronger but I really don’t know.

Steve Sailer calls the last two “affordable family formation”, and the reason why people marry earlier and have more children in places where suburban houses are cheaper. The first two are difficult anywhere in Western society. No-fault divorce makes women untrustworthy by definition. The expectation of a family wage for an adult man ended about 1970.

Implicit, conditional anti-natalism then takes two forms, closely related but not quite the same. Non-natalism is failure to reproduce because necessary conditions are never quite met. Incompetent natalism is when reproduction occurs, but the conditions are not completely met.

Non-natalism seems to be the lifestyle of many city dwellers who are not wealthy. People are dated, relationships of various levels of seriousness are formed and ended, but no suitable spouse is found. Money earned only covers a one-bedroom apartment and saving for a house in the suburbs requires more discipline than is possessed. The city has many enjoyable diversions that eat up the paycheck and it’s not that people don’t want to settle down and have kids, they just never get around to it. Married friends complain and provide horror stories that further discourage them.

I suspect this was true in earlier times. The Roman upper class had trouble getting their kids to get married and have kids, for similar reasons.

Incompetent natalism is where the typical white person, who wants to have a family, finds him or herself. I include myself in this group. How to get a decent-paying job? How to find a nice, trustworthy spouse? How to find a place to live where your kid isn’t going to get killed by a pit bull and you don’t have to drive two hours to work?

Most of the values and vices of say, lower middle class and above white Americans come from the English upper class. These kinds of behaviors and attitudes are what we are supposed to aspire to. The life history of an upper class English gentleman in Victorian times would be to go to an elite public school and university, spend time abroad for pleasure or on imperial business, have sex with lower class women to meet his sexual desires, and marry and have two children in his 30’s after a high-paying civil service position was available or his inheritance was secured.

These days bright children, male and female- which until recently was actual bright children, but now means all children- are encouraged to get an education, find themselves, have sex with various people, and get married and have two children in their 30’s when they have a good-paying job.

You can see that this advice will work for an upper class Victorian gentleman, and will work for modern Western young people if they are staring pretty high on the food chain, but is unlikely to work well if at all for most. If you are an upper class English gentleman with the income to support a family, you will not have to look hard for a wife- you will be pursued with all the energy and wits the girls can muster, as we know from Jane Austen. Her trustworthiness will be evaluated by nosy female relatives, as we know from Jane Austen. Income, safety, environment, and opportunity for offspring are given.

Young people these days get an education, which may be worthless. Even a STEM degree may be worthless. Still gotta pay the loans though! Rules and procedures for courtship are vague and confusing for everyone. The standards for an acceptable spouse are not clear. The long-term stability of any relationship, personal or business, is dubious.

People like to say these days that culture is downstream from politics, and it is, but it’s a circle, and so our politics are downstream of some culture. This culture wants to kill us so the only hope is counter-culture.

Counter-culture for white people. Who’s gonna do it?

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

Valentine and Uncle Laurence

Reblogged from my religion blog, since nobody reads it-


Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

The “Alt-Lite” Is Just Buckley All Over Again

A process that is strange on the surface, but totally predictable and understandable if you have seen it before, is the emergence of the “Alt Lite”, as I believe Hunter Wallace has dubbed it, a new political movement that supports Trump, adopts many nationalist positions, but rejects racism, sexism, anti-semitism, and homophobia.

First of all, this is a classic Jewish move. Prominent “Alt Lite” figures are Mike Cernovich and MILO. Jews don’t come up with new ideas and movements, they look for ones that are up and coming and worm their way in and take over. Trump of course did this with nationalism- which who knows may be proof he’s controlled by Jews- and then the Alt Lite did it with Trump specifically, and nationalism more generally.

What this also reflects is the history of the modern conservative movement. Leftism came to power in the US in the 1930’s, and by the 1950’s people were a little sick of it. A strong backlash against cosmopolitan socialism and the control of urban elites, Jewish, Puritan and Quaker, developed.

This kind of thinking had been culturally marginalized since the 30’s as small-minded, provincial, and mean-spirited. Everybody knew that cosmopolitan socialism of one kind or another- Soviet communism in the more benighted places, social democracy in the West- was the way to go. Communists and Western socialists regarded each other as fellow travelers, each believing themselves the senior partner

The Soviet takeover of Eastern Europe however angered a lot of people. They wanted to know why and how communists had such strong influence in the federal government.

TPTB couldn’t really just blow this off, because Soviet rule was far from democratic, and obviously cruel and unjust to all but the most committed. Politicians like Joseph McCarthy and organizations like the John Birch Society demanded to know who the communists were and what they were doing.

As English-speaking society does, this was deflected as a matter of social taste. To ask these questions was framed as being gauche and cruel. A few good-hearted folks may have been involved with the Communist Party years before, but why ruin their lives with reckless accusations? The term “smear” came to be used. All the best people agreed these questions were not to be asked.

Trouble was, as we know from the Venona transcipts, the US government was chock full of communists sympathizers, Party members, and actual Soviet agents. But it was not socially appropriate to say so.

People still wanted to be conservative though, and William F. Buckley came up with a solution. Form a conservative movement free of the cranks, soreheads and conspiracy theorists of the hinterlands and make it an urbane, gentile movement of Manhattan intellectuals.

This movement was still anti-communist, but dropped the idea that anyone in the US was a communist activist. It was still racist, sexist, and homophobic- this was the 50’s, after all- but not anti-semitic, because this was also socially handicapping by that point.

In rapid order, the left defined racism as socially unacceptable- and conservatives dropped it. Then sexism, then homophobia. As we know now, National Review has always been in favor of gay marriage!

If you want to oppose the corrupt system, but don’t want to be one of the weird kids, then the Alt Lite is for you!

Trouble with all this is that racism, sexism, anti-semitism, and homophobia are all true. Any ideology that does not put objective reality first is not going to work. Conservatism crippled itself by wanting to be socially acceptable first, and true second.

The Alt Lite, just like modern mainstream conservatism, is fundamentally just another form of liberalism and as such can’t compete with the real thing. National Review and William F. Buckley conservatism lasted around sixty years, but the Alt Lite isn’t even a movement, it’s just a pose. MILO is gone, and the rest will not last too much longer.

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

The Atlantic Is Stupid and Boring

The media is very upset about the President’s lack of respect, Atlantic writers David Frum and James Fallows being among the most butthurt.

I used to love the corporate media. I read newspapers every day. I watched the Sunday morning talk programs. I used to go to the bookstore on Mondays and read Time and Newsweek when they came out.

The Atlantic was once an excellent magazine. It used to have great long form pieces, particularly by William Langewiesche. Then Michael Kelly died, and it wasn’t the same.

I rarely read newspapers, and haven’t read the newsmagazines in a long time. I used to read the Atlantic online, but now it’s not even interesting to see what progs think. All these publications are pretty stupid and boring. It’s just bad writers pushing the official line.

There used to be at least some competition in the media. Publishers wanted to deliver a product worth reading to attract and hold readers. TV networks wanted ratings.

There’s little competition any more, and owners are mostly interested in ideology. The Washington Post is owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, and the New York Times in large part by Mexican telecommunications monopolist Carlos Slim. The Atlantic is owned by some guy who made a lot of money in medical records.

In any case the product is of low quality, which in this case means not informative, interesting or influential. The media doesn’t have the power it once had because it isn’t as good as it once was.

If Frum and Fallows are upset by their loss of influence, they should consider why people don’t consider them or the magazine they write for worth reading any more. The internet makes all kinds of information easier to get, and what it lacks in polish it makes up for in other ways.

President Trump- I love saying that- can trash the media because people already don’t like it. So guys, try not to suck so much.

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

The Elites Have Crimestopped Themselves Into Paralysis

As a refresher on Orwell, “crimethink” is prohibited thoughts, which is easy enough to understand, and “crimestop” is the mental process by which crimethink is avoided.

A normal person understands crimethink perfectly well, and understands that certain ideas, facts, or truths must not be aired in any formal social situation, be it work, family gatherings, or any other place where all present are both like-minded and trusted. There is a special moment between two white men, when one first uses the “n” word, and it is met with a laugh.

This is not difficult, because it is simply an extension of basic social rules about appropriate matters of discussion and expressions of values and attitudes. There are things you don’t talk about around your mom, your sister, or even your uptight brother. You can talk about certain very delicate things with your dad, but maybe not others. Normal people generally have no trouble with this.

Why then is crimestop needed? And what is it, exactly? Orwell described it as- “It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity.”

People outside of the power structure are simply discreet, as theoretically are people at the top. People instructing and enforcing social rules however must really believe them on some level. Thus in “Nineteen eighty-four” the proles are barely spoken of, and the people at the top, the “Inner Party” make an appearance only at the climax.

People at the top need to understand where social reality ends and actual reality begins. This has been a topic of discussion at Ribbon Farm. This is what it means to be in the Inner Party. The Outer Party, to which Winston, the hapless protagonist of 1984 belongs, creates and reinforces social reality but does not know the difference.

Unless people from the Outer Party actually become the Inner Party, or the Inner Party can’t control the Outer Party, which I guess could happen.

Things are really, really out of control right now. And there is no reason for it. Peasant rebellions are easily dealt with. The king appears, or makes an announcement, that mistakes have been made, by incompetent bureaucrats, and he is really sorry for not keeping a closer eye on these people. They may or may not be publicly or actually punished, but this is implied. Some leaders are met with and some concessions are made. If they were really necessary, and the king is smart, the concessions stay. If he doesn’t think they are really necessary, he can slowly and quietly revoke them a few months later and have the peasant leaders quietly taken care of.

The other alternative is to brutally crush the rebellion. This may be the way to go- you get to be and stay a king by making judgments like this- or it may be dumb. No ruler has absolute power. Every ruler has to have at least some acquiescence.

Our current ruler haven’t so much made a misjudgment, as lost the capability to see that anything could be wrong. You may say “Anyone opposed to undocumented immigrants is a racist” but if you actually believe it, you have lost a great deal of ability to take action or change direction. You may say “Black people are oppressed by whites, and especially by police officers” but if you actually believe it, you have taken away from yourself a great deal of ability to act.

A calm and partial walk back on immigration last year would have calmed down most of the current anger. People say Trump talks more about trade than immigration, but it was immigration that he got a toehold. Moslem terrorism- closely related- cemented it.

George W. Bush burned these bridges long ago, but after eight years of a progressive Democrat, Republicans could have made a change. Democrats, after eight years of a progressive Democrat, could have made a change to shore up their vulnerable spots. It would have been the smart thing to do.

But they can’t. The people fronting the organization are pretty old- Hilary, Bernie and Trump are all old- but the people running things are pretty young, and they can’t even remember when anybody thought anything different.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments