Golden Dawn social solidarity has often been denounced as “hateful charity” by world media, due to the fact that for once, native Greeks are served first.
Yet, the German government has struck a deal with the “Jewish Claims Conference” that will pay 772 million Euros (1 billion dollars) over 3 years as additional reparations to solely Jewish individuals that lived in German occupied territories in World War II.
Counter Currents has a series on Wagner, and in this part talks about “suprahumanism”, the idea of creating a new and superior type of human being. They root this artistically in Wagner, and philosophically in Nietzche, but regard it as spreading to all kinds of 20th century thought, in philosophies from Marxism-Leninism to the Objectivism of Ayn Rand.
This is an idea I have had since skimming through Faust, Part II by Goethe. (I couldn’t read it- it’s pretty bad.) The concept of Faust, Part II is that for the man who strives, nothing is forbidden and everything is forgiven. I don’t think Goethe meant this as a justification for mass oppression and murder, but this is what it eventually came to.
Was Nazism “suprahumanist”? Yes, but not in the same was communism was. Nazism believed the superman resided within the German people, whom Nazism regarded as a naturally heroic people oppressed by outside forces. This is close to Nietzche, who regarded the superman as not ordinary, but a rare individual who could and should be separate from the masses. Basic Romanticism wasn’t really suprahumanist, but simply looked to the common man and what it perceived as his virtues- emotion and spirit- as opposed to the elitist intellectual virtues of the Enlightenment, rationality and science.
Were other nationalist movements- Italian Fascism and Spanish Falangism, in particular, suprahumanist? I would say that while they had certain Romantic elements, no. These movements looked for practical solutions to modern problems without the extremes of either capitalist or communist ideology.
Where the writers of Counter Currents fall short, I think, is that they do not realize that the modern ruling liberal ideology, progressivism, is just as suprahumanist as the ideologies of the early 20th century. It is built on the proposal to create a new human being through education and moral reform. While not based in German Romanticism, it has essentially the same goals as Nazism and communism and offers the same dispensation to he who sets out to transform the world.
Awhile ago Steve Sailer had a bit on Obama and his role lecturing black people. He tells them they need to buck up, more or less, and blacks don’t care for it. T-N Coates said as much recently. My comment was-
“Obama is a one-off, just as Kennedy was a one-off. There will never be another Irish Catholic or any other kind of white ethnic president. They got their guy, they got to feel like they were part of the group. Obama has let black people feel like they have arrived, that they are now formally part of the power structure.
“But just as Kennedy represented the high water mark for white ethnics- their political influence was greatly diminished in just a few years after his death- Obama may represent the high water mark for blacks. The elite are stampeding over blacks to get Hispanic support tied up.”
And now this at VDare- the federal government is trying to get more Hispanics into high-paying jobs. It sucks when you’re not the cute one any more.
George W. Bush is famous for saying “I’m the decider.” While by all appearances he did pretty much whatever he wanted for eight years, I don’t think that’s quite how things work.
WRM analyzes the Obama terrorism speech- why the hell he would want to do that I don’t know, but he did and I read his blog so here we are- and he juxtaposes the “liberal legalists” versus Obama’s pragmatism, which he says is founded in “Christian Realism”. I had never heard of Christian Realism before so I looked it up. Apparently it was Reinhold Niebuhr’s criticism of the Social Gospel, a broad religious and political movement that put Christianity in progressive politics and progressive politics in Christianity, to the point you can hardly tell the difference. This wasn’t a new thing, just another phase in the political and religious union that goes back to Cromwell. Niebuhr’s criticism of the Social Gospel was that it wasn’t realistic, but far from being pragmatic his basic criticism was that it didn’t go far enough. Niebuhr apparently gave Marxism up, and in any case the success of progressive Christianity shows it went exactly far enough.
Mead doesn’t understand that the role of the liberal legalists is to harass the proles- something they do primarily with death penalty litigation, secondarily with other types of anti-criminal justice litigation, and from time to time with civil liberties litigation. The liberal legalists don’t impede anything important, like stop and frisk.
But beyond things done directly for the convenience of the elite, like stop and frisk, the elite knows they need to maintain a basic sort of credibility in keeping things right-side up. Sometimes the liberal legalists get too much power- they controlled the criminal justice system in the 60′s and 70′s, and somewhat into the 80′s. A gothic level of chaos resulted, and the proles rebelled- their final act being the recall of three California State Supreme Court Justices in the 80′s. If there is anyone to specifically blame for 9/11- besides Jamie Gorelick- it’s Frank Church, who restricted FBI activity in the 70′s.
The elite learned their lesson, which is why Bill Clinton went ahead with the execution of the retarded guy. Liberals know to rule the people must trust them to keep them sort of safe, and avoid the level of crime of the 70′s. Progressives like to bitch about stuff like crack cocaine sentencing, three strikes and the death penalty, and while they have the courts as their playgrounds on these things, liberal legislators leave these things alone. They don’t even really want to bother with gun control, but sometimes the base demands blood.
Bush and Obama did the same things because the people who really matter decided to keep most of the same policies from 2001 to the present. Another major terrorist attack would make the natives unpleasantly difficult to manage- the Boston bombers have caused them quite a bit of trouble.
This is how I get most of my news now. From the internet. Generally, I believe, from people who care about the Truth rather than Jew/Jew Thinker Jobber Careerists. And sometime the comment section of a blog is rich, very, very rich. Here's the blog I found this info on. Truth Militia.
STOCKHOLM
Hundreds of Swedes gather to fight race riots…
British National Party chairman Nick Griffin gives his take on the Woolwich murder that took place and makes a prediction that as more of this continues to happen, native Britains will give up on democracy and take the law into their own hands.
I don't think one has to be a prophet to know that the Western nations will more than likely succumb to civil wars between native Europeans and third worlders.
I have written about the role of fraternal organizations for non-elite whites here and here. I have an idea of what it would be, but an idea does not make an organization. Here is my concept, in the form of a charter or FAQ. I would appreciate comments and interest in going further. I’m not a leader, I’m not even a joiner. But I would like to do something.
The Ancient Brotherhood of Shepherds and Foresters
The Ancient Order of Shepherds and Foresters is a fraternal organization of the people of Europe wherever on earth they live. The AOSF works to provide mutual assistance and support, charity, and brotherhood among our people.
Why the Brotherhood?
Since the most ancient, unremembered times our people have live by principles of justice, equity, honor, commitment, and love. The people, civilization, culture and society of Europe have been the best in the world. Sometimes our rulers have been just and sometimes evil, but through most of time we have not depended on our rulers for anything except protection from outsiders. In recent centuries, the ideologies of capitalism and communism have told Europeans to see themselves as individuals in their relations to each other and the state, and they have been guaranteed prosperity and safety for this choice. These promises of prosperity and safety have been shown not merely to be empty but to be active, malicious deceptions, so the Brotherhood seeks to return us to the old system of mutual assistance.
We have always relied on such groups as families, churches, and guilds to provide for assistance when needed and to provide for opportunities for fruitful work. In the early years of capitalism friendly societies were founded so that people working in cities could have these same benefits.
In ancient times people without land or position could live on unclaimed, uncultivated lands herding flocks or hunting and foraging. The shepherd, beyond being a symbol of care and concern, was a person who could live off rugged grassland without a landlord or master. The forester could live, hunt and forage with others but was expected to be able to help fight off intruders, and before being admitted would have to prove his fighting skills.
Both shepherds and foresters were used as models for friendly societies- shepherds as models of care, foresters as models of mutual protection and assistance, and the Brotherhood seeks to combine these, so we use both in our name.
Why the Brotherhood now?
We have seen in recent years the failure of both capitalism and socialism to deliver on their promises to our people. Not only have these systems failed, the elites promoting them have shown their unrelenting hostility towards common Europeans everywhere. Beyond economic devastation and dependency, the elites have attacked common Europeans through destruction of our culture, false religion, promotion of sexual immorality, promotion of consumerism, and nihilistic entertainment, including athletics. To ask for redress of grievances from our rulers or response from the law, media or the so-called democratic political system is neither an immediate nor long-term solution to our problems.
Who are the Brotherhood?
The Brotherhood are ethnic Europeans. While marginal amounts of Native American or Asian ancestry are acceptable, all members must identify as European and with the European culture. We respect and use the practical aspects of other cultures but identify only with our own. The Brotherhood believes in freedom of conscience and pro-European Christians and practitioners of old European religions, not to include witchcraft, are accepted. No African ancestry is acceptable, nor the practice of non-European religions. No one of European ancestry part of, associated with or allied with the hostile elite, in any progressive political or religious organization may join or have any contact with the Brotherhood. This includes Puritans, Quakers, other progressive Christians, and members of progressive unions.
What does the Brotherhood do?
We come together to provide a positive community as an antidote to atomistic individualism. We help each other with opportunities to earn and produce. We help each other, and deserving Europeans in need who are not members. We avoid violence except in legal self-defense.
How are members of the Brotherhood expected to conduct themselves?
Members are expected to live and behave responsibly, for their own well-being as well as the well-being of their fellow members and fellow Europeans. They should live healthy lifestyles, avoid sexual immorality, consumerism, and nihilistic entertainment. They should obey the laws of the state and coming into formal and direct conflict with its power.
Why can’t Europeans who want to help others just go to churches or other charitable organizations?
Churches are essentially all progressive institutions. A person devastated by black crime going to a church will be told he must unconditionally forgive the black criminal and give money to the church, which will give it to blacks here or in Africa. The common European is to the progressive “Christian” church a “sinner” most certainly guilty of racism who must repent and commit himself to submitting to and helping blacks and other non-Europeans everywhere. The needs, physical and spiritual, of common Europeans go uncared for. Charitable organizations are largely the same.
Don’t many organizations for Europeans already exist?
Implicitly white institutions help elite whites and their allies. Explicitly white institutions are mostly ineffective or worse and built on outdated models. The progressive system creates a great deal of rage and despair, and these institutions provide a place for this to pool. Anger and hate are legitimate emotions but they need to be channeled effectively, and the best way to oppose the system is to help each other.
