“Savages” and the Limits of Conservative Thinking- Part II

As we have seen previously  the typical narrative of organized black mob violence, and for that matter unorganized black violence, understates the real culpability of blacks and liberals in promoting it. Far from being a chaotic eruption of atavistic aggression, it’s promoted and rationalized by and for people who know better.

Chaotic, random violence doesn’t seem to fit in the method of control of any social system. Random violence that is not chaotic on the other hand most certainly does.

First let us consider operant conditioning, the behavioral theory of B.F. Skinner. In operant conditioning, the stimulus that gets to strongest response is not predictable, but random. If the subject is well aware what behavior provides a response, positive or negative, it will engage in that behavior only when it wants, or needs to avoid, the response. If the subject is not sure what behavior causes the response, it must either engage in the behavior or avoid it at all times.

Random black violence then produces much more confusion and fear in whites than predictable black violence. Fear is a powerful force for controlling people- as liberals tell us ad nauseam, while simultaneously causing us to be afraid and demanding that we not be afraid, because that would mean we were being controlled by fascists.

The brain is designed so that negative mental states- fear, anger, and confusion- will be temporary. Fear or anger trigger the fight/flight reaction- the source of the fear is either attacked and eliminated, or run away from until it is no longer a danger. Constant fear and anger produce a terrible effect on the brain. It will constantly struggle to resolve these states.

The desire to resolve these states, and the impossibility of doing so, is the key to social control in America. Fight is absolutely impossible. Merely stating any negative opinion of black people, or even any individual black person, is extremely taboo. The only permitted way to attempt to resolve the fear of, and anger towards, blacks is to cooperate with the liberal program. Whatever ameliorative measures that are supposed to help blacks, and reduce their violence, must be assented to.

Even conservatives go along with most of these. The primary one is education; conservatives also like ones that are theoretically “market”, like inner-city enterprise zones. Conservatives are perfectly fine with most civil-rights legislation. Control of education, private business personnel decisions, urban planning and development, all come from black violence promoted by liberals.

Those who like the term “Black Run America” qualify it by saying blacks don’t actually run America, but it is run for their benefit. But this is also clearly not true. The two things that obviously harm blacks seriously are one, high levels of legal and illegal immigration, that have ruined the market for unskilled labor; and two the reward of control of black areas to the most violent part of the black population, have not benefited most black people at all.

This started in the 50’s, not because liberals were so interested in the welfare of blacks, but because the lower part of the white population was getting out of control. The Depression and World War II had kept the ethnic whites and southern whites cooperating with the system. In the 50’s though they became more affluent, and not as dependent on what the bosses would give them. Outsider whites had their own tight-knit communities, north and south, that they controlled. And they had employment in business and government not controlled by the elites.

The answer for the elites was to destroy these communities, and reduce the availability of income. E. Michael Jones wrote a book, The Slaughter of the Cities- Urban Renewal As Ethnic Cleansing describing this process. The point was not to provide blacks with nice places to live- they had perfectly adequate places to live as it was, the only problem they were filled with blacks- but to destroy community and social cohesion among whites, northern ethnics in particular.

As an aside, there was an interesting cultural part of this as well. Remember the continual mocking of “the lodge” in such old TV comedies such as “The Honeymooners” and “The Flintstones”. These lodges, or fraternal societies were key institutions of social welfare and social cohesion among the white ethnic working class. The Elks, Eagles, Moose, Foresters, Oddfellows, and numerous others while derided by Jewish TV writers provided support for the unemployed and injured before the widespread availability of unemployment insurance and worker’s compensation.

So while the average black person trudges home from his crappy job while praying the lounging thugs don’t take notice of him, a fair number of blacks are working in corporate or government jobs, making good money. Surely liberals mean to benefit these blacks, don’t they?

Sadly, no. The liberal does not even have a small soft spot in his tiny, shriveled, cold black heart for these black people. The purpose of forcing these jobs to be provided to blacks is in some small part to provide spoils to the loyal, but the primary reason, in my estimation, is more sinister. Putting black people in a white environment- any environment they don’t enter through their own merit- one, disrupts the environment for white people, and creates the fear and confusion mentioned earlier. Two, and even worse, the black interlopers act as spies and commissars for the system. White people must watch what they say and always remember their lessons in the presence of these blacks.

Yes, as bad as it appears to be, it is actually worse. Elite whites want lower class whites to be impovershed and frightened. Black people are not objects of pity for them, or even their spoiled pets- which would be wrong, but on some level understandable- but simply a tool, or more accurately a weapon of oppression by the powerful.

About these ads

About thrasymachus33308

I like fast cars, fast women and southern-fried rock. I have an ongoing beef with George Orwell. I take my name from a character in Plato's "Republic" who was exasperated with the kind of turgid BS that passed for deep thought and political discourse in that time and place, just as I am today. The character, whose name means "fierce fighter" was based on a real person but nobody knows for sure what his actual political beliefs were. I take my pseudonym from a character in an Adam Sandler song who was a obnoxious jerk who pissed off everybody.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to “Savages” and the Limits of Conservative Thinking- Part II

  1. red says:

    “Yes, as bad as it appears to be, it is actually worse. Elite whites want lower class whites to be impovershed and frightened. Black people are not objects of pity for them, or even their spoiled pets- which would be wrong, but on some level understandable- but simply a tool, or more accurately a weapon of oppression by the powerful.”

    Nailed it.

  2. Brandon says:

    Sorry, but there is no such thing as random/chaos. Everything has purpose behind it, but only a few have eyes to see it. “The curse (the evil) causeless does not come”.

  3. Pingback: Linkage is Good for You: Vacations Are Also Good for You Edition

  4. Eumaios says:

    The prefatory “Sorry, but” is a strong indication that the material following will be mindless tripe, and I thank all those who kindly provide me with that warning.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s